论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析AHplus糊剂与氧化锌丁香油(ZOE)糊剂在根管治疗术中的疗效。方法将152例牙髓病患者(177只患牙)随机分为观察组与对照组:观察组76例患者(87只患牙)采用AHplus糊剂填充根管;对照组76例患者(90只患牙)采用ZOE糊剂填充根管,现对比分析两组患者的疗效。结果①治疗前两组患者疼痛强度相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后1周观察组患者疼痛强度显著低于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②治疗后1年,观察组患牙治疗成功率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 AHplus糊剂在根管治疗术中可以显著缓解患者的疼痛,同时治疗成功率不受影响。
Objective To compare the curative effect of AHplus paste and ZOE paste in root canal therapy. Methods A total of 152 patients with endodontic disease (177 teeth) were randomly divided into observation group and control group. In the observation group, 76 patients (87 teeth) were treated with AHplus paste for root canal filling. In the control group, 76 patients (90 Teeth) ZOE paste filled with root canal, are now comparative analysis of the efficacy of two groups of patients. Results ① There was no significant difference in the pain intensity between the two groups before treatment (P> 0.05). The pain intensity of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group one week after treatment (P <0.05) . ② After 1 year of treatment, the successful rate of treating teeth in the observation group was not significantly different from that in the control group (P> 0.05). Conclusions AHplus paste can significantly relieve the patient’s pain during root canal therapy, while the success rate of treatment is not affected.