论文部分内容阅读
本文对曾振宇的反批评文章给予答复 ,以证《“前哲学概念”的“气论哲学研究”》一文对曾著《中国气论哲学研究》的批评并非“颠倒黑白”、“诬陷与中伤他人” ,亦非在曾书的“一些枝节的问题上大做文章”。按照曾书作者采自列维—布留尔的“原始思维”说 ,否认“中国有哲学” ,认为中国传统哲学的主干范畴是遵循“原始思维”之“互渗律”的“前哲学概念” ,才真正会“导致中国本土哲学独创性文化品格的沦丧与西方文化权力话语的横行”。本文举证说明 ,曾书严重“曲解”或“篡改”了张岱年先生在《中国哲学中的本体观念》一文中的观点。
This article gives a reply to Zeng Zhenyu’s anti-critical essay in order to prove that “the criticism of” the study of qi theory “of the” former philosophical concept “is not” reversed black and white, “” framed and slandered others “ Nor did he make a fuss about the issue of ”some branches“ once his book was published. According to the ”primitive thinking“ that the author of the book collected from Levi-Boullier, he denied ”China has philosophy,“ and held that the main category of Chinese traditional philosophy is the ”pre-philosophical concept“ that follows the ”law of mutual infiltration“ of ”primitive thinking“ Can we truly ”lead to the decline of the original Chinese cultural character of native philosophy and the rampant discourse of Western cultural rights.“ This article proves that Zeng Shu severely ”misinterpreted“ or ”tampered with“ the views of Mr. Zhang Dainian in his article ”The Concept of Noumenon in Chinese Philosophy."