论文部分内容阅读
随着政府职能的改革逐渐深入,政府慢慢从市场经济的操作者转变成监管者。监管者是尽职还是渎职,是决定经济能否健康发展、法制能否得到有效维护、社会能否平安祥和的关键所在。尤其是1997年刑法修正案开始实施以后如何有效的预防、打击渎职犯罪成为我国法学理论界和实务界的热点问题。渎职犯罪的立法缺陷、理论研究的相对匮乏与现实中存在的各种不利因素,直接影响了司法实践中对渎职犯罪的有效打击,这成为困扰实务界尤其是检察机关的难题之一。潘承凡在《人民日报》2007年5月11日撰文指出:渎职之害猛于虎。最高人民检察院渎职侵权检察厅副厅长关福金说得更加到位:渎职是社会不和谐的诱因。打击渎职犯罪,尤其是食品安全方面的犯罪,近些年来呼声越来越高。本文立足检察工作实际,以案说法,坚持思辨与实证相结合,理论联系实际,对如何有效打击危害食品安全的渎职犯罪做一些探讨。
With the gradual deepening of the reform of government functions, the government gradually shifted from a market economy operator to a regulator. Whether the regulator is due diligence or malfeasance is the key to determining whether the economy can develop healthily, whether the legal system can be effectively maintained, and whether the society can be peaceful and peaceful. In particular, how to effectively prevent and crack down on dereliction crime after the implementation of the Criminal Law Amendment in 1997 has become a hot issue in China’s jurisprudence and practice circles. The legislative defects of dereliction of duty, the relative lack of theoretical research and the various unfavorable factors in reality have a direct impact on the effective crackdown on dereliction crime in judicial practice, which has become one of the problems that plagues practitioners, especially procuratorial organs. Pan Chengfan wrote in the People’s Daily on May 11, 2007: The dereliction of duty is fierce. Guan Fujin, deputy director of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate’s Office of Malfeasance Prosecutor’s Office, put it even more: malfeasance is an incentive for social discord. The fight against dereliction of duty, especially in the area of food safety, has become louder and louder in recent years. Based on the actual work of procuratorial work, taking the case as a case, sticking to the combination of speculation and positivism, and combining theory with practice, this article makes some discussions on how to effectively combat dereliction of duty that endangers food safety.