萝卜青菜各有所爱,正因如此,有些好的研究成果并不一定会被每个人欣赏,所以不同审稿者的不同评判标准可能会关系到文章发表的成败。文章评审一般由少数(2—3名)同行完成,编辑参考评审意见做是否录用的最后决定。如果有一个评审人对你的工作没兴趣,或有不利的偏见,就会对总体的评审有较大影响。 Because of this, some good research results are not necessarily appreciated by everyone, so the different criteria of different reviewers may be related to the success or failure of publication. Article review generally completed by a handful of (2-3) counterparts, editorial reference to the comments made to decide whether to accept the final decision. If a reviewer is not interested in your job or has a negative bias, it will have a greater impact on the overall review.