论文部分内容阅读
成人利用意图信息对他人行为进行评价时存在不稳定的现象.通过两个实验对大学生法律判断和道德判断中意图信息的利用情况进行考察,从而探讨运用两种不同规则进行判断时的认知差异和特点.研究发现:当行为存在重大负性后果时,道德判断受意图因素影响,而法律判断不受意图因素影响;当行为不存在重大负性后果时,法律判断和道德判断都受意图因素的影响,道德判断对负性意图的合法性不敏感.
There is an instability phenomenon when adults use intention information to evaluate others’ behavior.On the basis of two experiments, the author makes an investigation on the utilization of intention information in legal judgment and moral judgment of college students to explore the cognitive difference when using two different rules to judge And characteristics.The research found that when the behavior has significant negative consequences, the moral judgments are affected by the intent factors, while the legal judgments are not affected by the intent factors. When there is no significant negative consequences, the legal judgments and moral judgments are affected by the intent factors The moral judgment is insensitive to the legitimacy of the negative intentions.