论文部分内容阅读
2个实验对PDP的启动型实验程序与Richardson -Klavehn的修正模型进行了比较研究 ,通过对指示语的操纵 ,考察提取策略是否完全受意志控制 ,以及注意水平、刺激材料、测验类型、加工水平对被试作业的影响。结果发现 :刺激材料对有意识控制记忆的实验结果影响很大 ,对PDP的无意识自动加工参数无影响 ;启动型实验程序的结果与PDP理论相当一致 ;提取策略不一定是受意志精确控制的
Two experiments conducted a comparative study on the startup experiment program of PDP and the Richardson-Klavehn correction model. Through the manipulation of the directives, we inspected whether the extraction strategy was completely controlled by the will, as well as the attention level, the stimulus material, the type of test, the level of processing Impact on the test assignment. The results show that stimulating materials have a great influence on experimental results of intentionally controlled memory and have no effect on PDP’s unconscious automatic processing parameters. The results of startup-type experimental procedures are quite consistent with PDP theory. The extraction strategy is not necessarily controlled by the will