鉴定会议,据我所知是过去向苏联学习的产物。鉴定会议的本意是件好事,说得通俗点,就是大家来评论新产品。但是我们的许多鉴定会议,有点公式化,重形式而轻实质。近来因工作需要,也参加了不少鉴定会议,颇有感受。本刊第6期在“机电新产品研制工作中存在的问题和改革意见”一文中,就提到“立题不严,鉴定马虎”,该文写得很中肯,很有启发。这里,我想再谈四个问题。(1)鉴定的主要内容,是考核一个新产品能否符合批准的设计任务书(它应该包括产品的成套性、系列化和国内外市场的需求情况),但以往这一任务书往往是上级用行政命令方式下达的,要求不严密,不明确,存在着很大的盲目性。一机部孙友余副部长在今 The Accreditation Conference, to my knowledge, was the product of past learning from the Soviet Union. Accreditation meeting of the original intention is a good thing, to put it popularly, is everyone to comment on new products. However, many of our accreditation conferences are somewhat formalized, formally formal and light in substance. Recently due to work needs, but also participated in a lot of identification meetings, quite feel. The sixth issue of “mechanical and electrical products in the development of new problems and reform opinions,” one article, referred to “lax issue, appraisal sloppy”, the article is very fair and very inspiring. Here, I would like to talk about four more issues. (1) The main content of the appraisal is to evaluate whether a new product can meet the approved design task (which should include product completeness, serialization and the needs of domestic and foreign markets), but in the past this task book was usually supervisor Issued by way of administrative order, the demand is not rigorous, not clear, there is a great blindness. Deputy Minister Sun Youyu, a machine department, is here today