论文部分内容阅读
解释学逻辑和我国制度逻辑之间的背离与张力,引发了学者对我国法律解释体制进行重构的理论冲动。但是,应然的理论逻辑并不足以否定实然的制度逻辑,而是应从制度逻辑的功能正当性出发,解决理论逻辑和制度逻辑的张力。这需要在维护立法解释权合理性的前提下,肯定司法解释权的能动性,通过具体的制度性措施,解决立法解释权和司法解释权的配置与协调问题,以及法官具体性法律解释权和最高法院规范性司法解释权的协调问题,并实现司法解释权的自我约束,防止规范性司法解释权向立法权以及法官独立审判权的过度僭越。
The divergence and tension between the logic of hermeneutics and the logic of our system have triggered the theoretical impulse of scholars to reconstruct the legal interpretation system in our country. However, the theoretical logic that should be is not enough to deny the true institutional logic, but should be based on the functional legitimacy of the institutional logic to solve the tension of theoretical logic and institutional logic. This requires affirming the motivation of judicial interpretation under the premise of maintaining the rationality of the power of legislative interpretation and resolving the allocation and coordination of the power of legislative interpretation and judicial interpretation through specific institutional measures and the highest legal interpretation power of judges The normative judicial interpretation of the court and the realization of the self-restraint of the power of judicial interpretation, so as to prevent the over-contravention of the normative judicial interpretation power from the legislative power and the judge’s independent jurisdiction.