论文部分内容阅读
不同的证据方法有着不同的证明机制。诉讼法上的证据原本就是二元的,其既可以是物的客观存在,也可以是人对案件事实的主观认知,在定义证据之时必须顾及到这一点。要么认为物证是证据,要么认为勘验(检查)笔录、现场笔录与鉴定结论是证据,但不能将二者同时均认为是证据,因为勘验(检查)笔录、现场笔录与鉴定结论都是由物证派生出来的。现有的主要几种定义证据的方式值得反思。
Different evidence methods have different proof mechanisms. The evidence in the procedural law is originally binary. It can be either the objective existence of things or the subjective cognition of the facts of the case, which must be taken into consideration when defining the evidence. Either the evidence is considered evidence, or that the inspection (inspection) transcripts, on-site transcripts and identification conclusion is evidence, but not both at the same time that the evidence, because the inspection (inspection) transcripts, on-site transcripts and identification of conclusions are from Material evidence derived. There are several major existing ways of defining evidence worth reflecting on.