行政问责制在我国实施以来取得了积极成效。但问责实践的各个阶段都存在问题。事前阶段的问题是问责触发的非常态化,问责主体不明确,问责客体范围不全面;事中阶段的问题是问责标准弹性过大,问责配套制度供给不足;事后阶段的问题是缺失对问责的救济制度规定,缺失对被问责官员去向的制度规定。为此,需要明确行政问责主体及其权限,拓宽行政问责适用范围,统一行政问责标准和责任形式,完善行政问责程序和救济制度。 The administrative accountability system has achieved positive results since its implementation in our country. However, there are problems in all stages of accountability practice. The problems in the pre-stage are the abnormal state triggered by accountability, the unclear accountability body, and the incomplete scope of the accountability object. The problems in the mid-stage are that the accountability standard is too flexible and the system of accountability support is inadequate. Problems in the later stage It is a lack of provisions for remedies for accountability and a lack of rules and regulations on the whereabouts of officials who are accountable. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the main body of administrative accountability and its authority, broaden the scope of administrative accountability, unify administrative accountability standards and forms of responsibility, and improve administrative accountability procedures and relief systems.