论文部分内容阅读
基于经济分权与市场转轨的特定背景,上世纪80年代末《行政诉讼法》的诞生部分程度上源自中央控制地方官僚、顺利实现市场转轨的制度性需求,这种特征最明显体现在“侵犯企业经营自主权”的行政诉讼案件中,通过对“侵犯企业经营自主权”行政诉讼司法政策与司法判例的微观考察,不难发现,行政诉讼在纠正地方基层政府干涉辖区内集体企业、私营企业经营自主权事项上,起到了一定的拘束监控作用。从产权变迁的角度而言,尽管相关证据表明,与其他制度因素相比,行政诉讼在产权变迁流程中并未起到主导作用,但行政诉讼司法实践却一定程度上体现了中央意图借助行政诉讼工具来拘束“法团化”的地方政府,推动地方层面上关系产权、混合产权向现代产权转型的国家意志。
Based on the specific background of economic decentralization and market transition, the birth of “Administrative Procedure Law” in the late 1980s came partly from the central control of local bureaucrats and the institutional demand for the smooth realization of market transition. This characteristic is most evident in the In the administrative litigation cases of “infringement of the autonomy of enterprise management”, it is not difficult to find out through the microscopic investigation of the judicial infringement upon the autonomy of enterprises that administrative autonomy Collective enterprises, private enterprises operating matters of autonomy, played a restraining role in monitoring. From the perspective of property rights change, although the relevant evidences show that compared with other institutional factors, administrative litigation has not played a leading role in the process of property rights change, but the judicial practice of administrative litigation to some extent reflects the central government’s intention to resort to administrative litigation Tools to constrain the local government of “corporation” and promote the will of the state at the local level in relation to property rights and the transformation of mixed property rights into modern property rights.