论文部分内容阅读
创作者深入生活实在是老生常谈的话题了。常耳 闻目睹某某摄制组在影片开拓前几天,便“深入”外 景地“体验”生活,同当地百姓同吃同住……等等。 然而,他们真“深入”了吗? 生活是积累,而不是“体验”;没有长期的切身 体验,没有置身其中的情感融渗,无论如何算不得生 活;充其量仅仅是一种介入性的观摹。即令是同锅同 炕,也只是生活的部分表面现象、皮毛而已,而不是 本质。况且任何一个人,他的个性、文化素质,甚至 语言和动作,都是经过其全部生存环境的长期浸泡逐 渐形成,不可能由于数日环境改变而改变。因而,“突 击”式的“深入生活”得到的往往是浮泛的表象感受, 抑或是扭曲的错误判断。
Creator in-depth life is really a topic of clichés. I often hear a certain Moumou film crew a few days before the pioneering, they “in-depth” location “to experience” life with the local people eating together ... ... and so on. However, are they really “in-depth”? Life is accumulation rather than “experience”; there is no long-term personal experience, there is no emotional infiltration in it, and life can not be calculated anyway; at best, it is merely an interventional concept . Even if the same pot with the kang, but also part of the surface life phenomenon, fur only, not the essence. Moreover, any individual, his personality, cultural qualities, even language and movements, have all evolved through long-term immersion in their entire living environment and can not be changed by a few days of environmental change. Thus, “assault” style of “in-depth life” often get floated appearances, or distorted miscalculations.