论文部分内容阅读
对于开明专制论,学界一般比较注意其在清末提出时的基本主张以及思想界对它的批评,而较少关注其在民国初年的情况。梁启超等人在民国初年仍然坚持开明专制论,他们恐惧革命之后可能出现的暴民专制、忧虑革命再次发生的可能,希望依傍现有的政治权势,行开明专制,以向宪政过渡,但终为政治权势所玩弄。坚持共和民主立场的人士以及革命党人,对于开明专制有系统的批评,或坚持民主政治可以随时随地起步,或坚持应由革命党掌握政权以行训政。
For the enlightened autocratic theory, the academic circles generally pay more attention to their basic propositions put forward in the late Qing Dynasty and the criticisms from them in the intellectual circles, and pay less attention to their situation in the early years of the Republic of China. Liang Qichao and others persisted in the early years of the Republic of China that they were open to the tyranny of tyranny after the revolution and were worried about the possibility of a recurrence of the revolution. They hoped that according to the existing political power, they would open their autocracy and make a transition to constitutional government. However, Play with political power. Persons insisting on a republican democratic stand and revolutionaries have systematically criticized the enlightened autocracy or insisted that democratic politics should be started anytime, anywhere, or insisted that the revolutionary party should seize power to carry out its task of training politics.