论文部分内容阅读
过去在建筑理论和建筑实践中,使“百家争鸣”没有获得较好展开的原因很多,其中我认为要以建筑设计思想问题没有澄清的影响较大。一般忽略了建筑本身的物质性及其在使用上、创作上存在的各种客观规律,而走上了脱离实际的形式主义道路,风行—些似是而非的清规戒律:认为平屋顶建筑就是结构主义方盒子建筑,街坊设计必须是周边式,有些苏联建筑规范翻译过来尚未经过结合我国各地实际情况加以研究就要求普遍应用等例子,形成了科学技术问题上一边倒的现象。这种不经讨论研究的简单作风,显然妨
In the past, in architectural theory and construction practice, there are many reasons for the failure to achieve better development of “a hundred schools of thought”, among which I believe that there is a great deal of ambiguity in the issue of architectural design. Generally neglecting the material nature of the building itself and its various objective laws in use and creation, it has embarked on a formalist road that has been separated from reality. It is popular—a plausible slavish rule: the flat-roofed building is considered a structuralist square box. The design of buildings and neighborhoods must be of a peripheral type. Some translations of the Soviet building codes have not yet been studied in light of the actual situation in various parts of the country and require universal application. The phenomenon of one-sided fall in scientific and technological issues has been formed. This simple style that has not been discussed and studied obviously helps