论文部分内容阅读
在法兰西学院的就职演讲中,罗兰·巴尔特认为权力无处不在:它在这里被耗尽,在别的地方又会重新萌生。权力寄附的东西就是语言或者语言常见的表达形式:语言结构。为了瓦解隐藏在语言结构中的权力,他从特鲁别茨柯伊、叶姆斯列夫等人的音位学著作中挪用了“中性”概念,并且将它和怀疑论哲学结合起来。事实证明,这种错误的理论嫁接不但削弱了其思想解构的锋芒,而且使他逐渐蜕变为一个遭人厌弃的寂静主义者。巴尔特晚期的这一形象既动摇了我们的固有观念,也促使我们对他以及他的理论展开更加全面、有效的新评估。
In his inaugural address at the Faculty of Law in France, Roland Barthes argues that power is everywhere: it is depleted here and again in other places. What is attached to power is the common expression of language or language: language structure. In order to disrupt the power hidden in the linguistic structure, he embezzled the concept of “neutrality” from the phonemic works of Trubutzkoi and Emslev, and combined it with skepticism stand up. Facts have proved that this erroneous theory of grafting not only weakens the cutting edge of his ideological deconstruction, but also gradually transformed into an abandoned naturist. This late Bartelt image not only shakes our inherent notion but also prompts us to launch a more comprehensive and effective new assessment of him and his theory.