在康德美学体系中,最使人迷惑不解的是其崇高理论,著名康德专家R·W·巴雷特尔认为,康德的崇高理论“几乎不能被论述清楚。”然而全面的考察康德美学体系并昭示其崇高理论是通达自由本体的一种否定性取向时,康德崇高理论中的许多困惑便消解了。一在沉思崇高的构成时,康德不仅完全放弃了郎吉奴斯、柏克开启的通过对象的性质判定崇高特征的经验方法,而且改变了他在解析优美和艺术时所使用的综合视角,对崇高的界定,一开始便是分析的。康德发现,作为崇高判断的对象与其判断结果 One of the most puzzling of Kant’s aesthetic system is its sublime theory, which is well-known by Kant’s expert RB Wright, who believes that Kant’s lofty theory “can hardly be discussed clearly.” However, a comprehensive study of Kant’s aesthetic system And shows that its sublime theory is a negative orientation to a free ontology, many of the confusion in Kant’s sublime theory has been resolved. As soon as Kant considered the sublime constitution, Kant had not only completely abandoned the empirical method of determining lofty traits through the nature of the object opened by Langinius and Burke, but also changed the comprehensive perspective that he used in analyzing grace and art. Sublime definition, from the beginning is analyzed. Kant discovers, as the object of lofty judgment and its judgment