论文部分内容阅读
《党史博览》编辑部: 贵刊1997年第11期发表了以我为主人公的《张登全:一个为彭总提供“意见书”素材的战士》一文。作者在寄发这篇文章时,我不知道。我认为写历史不能昧着良心,不能根据政治需要。党就是党,毛泽东就是毛泽东,彭德怀就是彭德怀。文中也存在许多史实错误,主要表现在以下几方面。 首先,这篇文章的命题就是错误的。彭总在庐山会议上的发言是他亲自考察12个省份,走访了数县及许多乡村,并根据我们党在当时指导思想上的错误,从大局出发,从一个共产党员的高度责任感在此次会议上为人民鼓与呼的。小小警卫战士的我怎敢玷污这位伟人的光辉。我的事迹太渺小了。将来有机会我自己会写,而且我还要报告彭总写作组审查。 其次,我家饿死的人是小弟弟而不是小妹妹,时间是在1960年。1960年我正在狱中,根本不知此事。1962年平反后,回家探亲时才知此惨事。
“History of the Communist Party of China” editorial department: Your issue No. 11 of 1997 published my heroine’s “Zhang Dengquan: one for Peng to provide” submissions “material warrior” article. I did not know when the author sent this article. I think writing history can not be conscientious and can not be based on political needs. Party is the party, Mao Zedong is Mao Zedong, Peng Dehuai is Peng Dehuai. There are also many historical errors in the text, mainly in the following aspects. First of all, the proposition of this article is wrong. At his meeting in Lushan, Peng Zongren personally inspected 12 provinces and visited several counties and many villages. Based on the mistakes made by our party in guiding ideology at the time and proceeding from the overall situation, a high sense of responsibility from a communist party The meeting drums and calls for the people. How can I defile the gloriousness of this great man? My story is too small. In the future, I will have the opportunity to write, and I will also report to Peng’s writing team for review. Secondly, my family starved to death is a younger brother rather than a sister, the time is in 1960. I was in prison in 1960, I did not know it. After the rebellion in 1962, went home to visit relatives to know this tragedy.