论点型议论文是议论文众多样式中最普遍的、运用最广泛的一种。其主要特点是论题与中心论点的内涵完全一致。外延互相重合。写此类议论文,作者只需将本已明确的中心论点予以充分论证即可。也就是说,其引论和本论是“因果关系”:引论部分的中心论点是“果”,本论部分的论证是“因”。本论部分应论证引论部分所提出的中心论点能够成立或不容否定的理由和根据。它远比供材料作文(议论文)易学易写得多。因为供材料作文需作者自己去归纳、提炼所供材料之观点。假如作者对所供材料理解不正确或者有所偏差,那么势必导致文章的观点(即论点)错误,导致作文失败。换言之,论点型议论 Argumentative argumentative papers are the most common and widely used ones in many arguments of argumentation. Its main feature is that the content of the argument is exactly the same as that of the central argument. Extensions overlap each other. To write such argumentative papers, the author only needs to fully demonstrate the central arguments that have been made clear. In other words, the introduction and the theory are “causality”: the central argument of the introduction is “effect”, and the argument of the argument is “cause.” The part of this article should demonstrate the reason and basis for the central argument proposed by the introduction part to be established or not to be negated. It is far more than writing materials for argumentation. Because for the material composition, the author needs to summarize and refine the viewpoints of the materials provided. If the author’s understanding of the materials provided is incorrect or biased, it will inevitably lead to mistakes in the opinions (ie arguments) of the articles and lead to failure of the composition. In other words, argumentative argumentation