2012年《刑事诉讼法》将技术侦查措施作为专门的一节来进行调整,这在我国是首次提出,对《刑事诉讼法》乃至整个法治进程都有重要意义,但此次规定有很多不足,其未规定技术侦查措施的种类、对技术侦查措施的批准机关不明确、缺乏对被采取技术侦查措施人的权利保障、缺乏对适用技术侦查措施的合法性审查等问题。为此,应明确规定技术侦查措施的种类及适用条件,明确技术侦查措施的批准机关,明确适用技术侦查措施必须合法。 The 2012 Criminal Procedure Law, which takes the technical investigation measures as a special section for adjustment, is the first proposal in our country that is of great significance to the Criminal Procedure Law and the entire process of the rule of law. However, this stipulation has many deficiencies, It does not stipulate the types of technical investigation measures, which are not clear for the approval agencies of technical investigation measures, lack of protection of the rights of those who have been taken technical investigation measures, and lack of the examination of the legality of the applicable technical investigation measures. To this end, the types of technical investigation measures and applicable conditions should be clearly stipulated. It is necessary to clarify the authority that approves technical investigation measures and to explicitly apply the technical investigation measures.