论文部分内容阅读
在“民”或“俗”之间做出一种选择,这对民俗学者来说可能是个奇怪的问题。究竟是侧重对“民”的研究,还是将“俗”作为主要的研究对象?根本上来讲,“民”和“俗”两者本身相辅相成,缺一不可。但民俗学学科内部的这两种观点的分界是真实存在的,并对民俗学界产生了重要影响。从客观的角度分析,必须在“民”或“俗”之间做出一个选择,想要否定或杜绝这样的二分法是没有益处的,事实上,两种方式各有其意义,旨在将民俗学引向不同的发展前景。
Making a choice between “folk ” or “vulgar ” may be a weird question for folklorists. Whether it focuses on the study of “people ”, or “vulgar ” as the main research object? Fundamentally speaking, “people ” and “vulgar ” both complement each other, are indispensable. However, the demarcation of these two views within the folklore discipline is real and has an important influence on folklore. From an objective point of view, we must make a choice between “people ” or “vulgar ”. There is no merit in trying to negate or eliminate such dichotomy. In fact, both approaches have their own meaning , Aims to lead folklore to different development prospects.