论文部分内容阅读
2008年,著名学者李凇在《略论考古学的影响与中国美术史学的学科性》一文中对当下美术史的研究提出了这样的看法:“从实际情况看,现今的‘美术史’已经大量涌进了难以称之为‘美术品’的研究对象,美术史家的兴趣也早已不在主要限于寻找一流美术作品和探讨艺术大师产生的原因,二流、三流、甚至不入流的作品或作者都已具有相等的价值。简言之,美术史的对象绝不限于‘美’的作品,‘美’或‘艺术性’已不是作品能否进入研究领域的
In 2008, famous scholar Li Kuo put forward the following opinion on the study of current art history in his article ”The Influence of Archeology and the Discipline of Chinese Art Historiography“: ”From the actual situation, the current“ art history ” There has been a large influx of research objects that are hard to call “fine art”. The interest of fine art historians is no longer limited mainly to the search for first-rate art works and the reasons for the great masters of art. Both second-rate, third-rate and even inflow-free works or authors In short, the object of art history is by no means limited to the works of ’beauty’, and ’beauty’ or ’art’ is no longer whether the work can enter the field of study