论文部分内容阅读
反垄断司法实践中的合理规则最初出现在美国,后来对欧洲多数国家和日本等国家的反垄断实践产生了重大影响。作为原则性与灵活性的统一,合理规则被广泛应用在反垄断的司法实践中。通过对合理规则产生背景的考察,可以得出以下结论:应充分认识到反垄断问题的复杂性;经济学在反垄断立法和执法中具有重要作用;合理规则具有两面性;在我国今后的反垄断执法中可借鉴和应用合理规则。
The reasonable rules in antitrust judicial practice first appeared in the United States and later had a significant impact on antitrust practices in most European countries and Japan. As a unity of principle and flexibility, reasonable rules are widely applied in antitrust judicial practice. Through the investigation of the background of reasonable rules, we can draw the following conclusions: The complexity of antitrust issues should be fully recognized; economics plays an important role in antitrust legislation and law enforcement; the rational rules have two sides; in the future antitrust Law enforcement can learn from and apply reasonable rules.