论文部分内容阅读
作为一个承前启后的历史阶段,“1990年代诗歌”的重要性已得到学术界的普遍认可。只是人们对它的研究和评价观点纷纭复杂,莫衷一是。那么“1990年代诗歌”是否值得认真研究,该从什么角度、运用何种方法进行研究;它在生存、传播方式上和传统诗歌相比,具有哪些不同与优长;它的现实主义形态是如何发生的,又出现了怎样的“变形”;它到底是开辟了个人化写作的理想时代,提供了新的写作可能性,还是陷入了偏于一极的误区;在它成为公开知识的今天以反思的视角透析,是不是可以说它带有不可规避的缺憾?面对上述一系列的疑惑,国内学术界颇具影响的罗振亚、吕周聚、蒋登科、李润霞、霍俊明等五位诗评家,分别就这些问题进行了细致、深入、自由的探讨,相信他们的思考会把“1990年代诗歌”的研究提升到新的层次和高度。
As a historical stage, the importance of “Poetry in the 1990s” has been generally recognized by academics. Only people have different views on its research and evaluation. Then, whether “the poetry of the 1990s” deserves to be studied carefully, from what angle should it be used and what method should be used for its research? What is its difference and superiority compared with the traditional poetry in terms of its way of survival and communication; its realistic form How it happened, and what kind of “distortion” appeared. Whether it opened an ideal era of personalized writing, provided a new possibility of writing, or fell into a pole of misunderstanding. After it became public Knowledge of today’s perspective of reflection to dialysis, is it right? Can be said that it with the inevitable shortcomings? Faced with a series of doubts, the domestic academic influential Luo Zhenya, Lu Zhou Ju, Jiang Dengke, Li Runxia, Huo Junming and other five poems Commentators, respectively, conducted detailed, in-depth and free discussions on these issues, believing that their thinking would elevate the study of “Poetry in the 1990s” to a new level and height.