论文部分内容阅读
“十七年文学”研究的重要性不言而喻,目前它却在整体上遭遇了一些困境。“现代性”和“历史化”是“十七年文学”研究中经常使用的观念,然而,前者在错位语境下的有效性边界问题,后者在实际操作中容易出现的某些局限,可能也是值得关注和商榷的。同时,无论在自由主义者还是在左翼学人那里,“个人”已经成为“十七年文学”研究范式和“知识”焦虑的一个严重症结。与此不同的是,“解殖民”视野因其同时注重历史感、过程性和知识“决断”等问题,呈现出特别的开放性与整合能力,或可为“十七年文学”研究打开新的空间。
The importance of “seventeen years of literature” research is self-evident. At present, however, it has encountered some difficulties as a whole. “Modernity” and “Historicization” are frequently used concepts in the study of “Seventeen Years of Literature.” However, the former is a valid boundary problem in the context of dislocation, and the latter is easy to operate in practice Some of the limitations that may arise are also noteworthy and open to question. At the same time, “personal ” has become a serious crux of anxiety in the “seventeen-year literature” research paradigm and “knowledge ”, both in terms of liberalism and left-wing scholarship. In contrast, the vision of “solution to colonialism” presents a special capability of openness and integration due to its simultaneous emphasis on the issues of history, process and knowledge, “decision”, or “seventeen years Literature ”research opens up new space.