用卵巢管膨大部来估计蚊的经产情况已延续40余年。这个由Polovodova所建立的传统方法,现已受到许多俄国学者的挑战。新的学说除Hoc等(1990)提及外,它在俄国以外的响应并不明显。本文讨论了卵巢管膨大部的形成,并对新旧两种学说进行了比较。虽然Polovodova方法的应用不影响两学说的前提,但要了解传统方法及其局限性,尚需对卵巢动力学进行清楚的描述。 Oviduct enlargement to estimate the mosquito production has been extended for more than 40 years. This traditional method, established by Polovodova, is now challenged by many Russian scholars. The new doctrine, except that mentioned by Hoc et al. (1990), is not obvious outside of Russia. This article discusses the formation of ovarian duct enlargement and compares the two theories. Although the application of the Polovodova method does not affect the prerequisites of the two doctrines, understanding of the traditional methods and their limitations requires a clear description of ovarian dynamics.