《解放日报》的《班组生活》专栏从今年1月下旬起,开展了“一人违纪,全组受罚对不对?”的专题讨论。肯定这种方法的人认为,这是普遍采用的做法。采用联保形式来考核班组,反映了生产过程中人各有责、互相联系的实际,确实起到了相互督促、相互制约的作用,增进了集体观念。有的虽肯定这种方法,但认为这是一种辅助手段,关键还在于加强思想政治工作。应该 From the end of January this year, the “Daily Life” column of the “Liberation Daily” started a thematic discussion on “One Person Violates Discipline and Fight the Whole Group Rightly?” Those who affirm this approach think it is a common practice. Using the UNPROFOR form to assess teams and teams reflects the fact that people in the production process each have their own responsibilities and are in contact with each other. Indeed, they have indeed played a role of mutual supervision and mutual restraint and have promoted collective concepts. Although some affirmed this method, they think this is an auxiliary means and the key lies in strengthening ideological and political work. should