论文部分内容阅读
1929年6月、12月,毛泽东率领红四军两次在闽西连城县新泉的活动,与古田会议有着密切的关系。目前学术界对于毛泽东在新泉《给林彪的信》的意义似乎还关注不够,而古田会议决议(即《中国共产党红军第四军第九次代表大会决议案》)是否在新泉起草的问题,有不同的解读。笔者认为,关于历史的表述,应当以科学的方法和理性的分析,用证据解读历史。古田会议决议是毛泽东自井冈山以来,特别是1929年在闽西经过调查、总结,在中央九月来信(即《中共中央给红四军前委的指示信》)指导下形成的。而毛泽东在闽西的调查研究和经验总结,包含了1929年五六月间红四军党内的一系列会议和同年11月贯彻中央九月来信以及新泉整训的各种活动。
In June and December 1929, Mao Zedong led the Red Army four times in Xinquan, Liancheng County, western Fujian, and had close relations with the Gutian Conference. At present, the academic circles seem to pay insufficient attention to the significance of Mao Zedong’s letter to “Lin Biao” in Xinquan. The question whether the resolution of the Gutian Conference (that is, the “Resolution of the Ninth Congress of the Fourth Red Army of the Communist Party of China”) was drafted in Xinquan Different interpretations. The author believes that the expression of history should be based on scientific methods and rational analysis of evidence to interpret history. Gutian Conference resolution is Mao Zedong since Jinggangshan, especially in 1929 in western Fujian after investigation, concluded, in September the letter from the Central Committee (that is, “the CPC Central Committee to the letter of the Red Army’s Fourth Committee”) under the guidance of. However, Mao Zedong’s investigations and studies in western Fujian summed up his experience and contained a series of meetings held by the Red Army army in May and June 1929 in 1929 and various activities to implement the September letter of the Central Committee and the training of Shinsei in November of the same year in the same year.