论文部分内容阅读
司法公正与正当舆论监督,本质上殊途同归,都是捍卫社会公义。法律保障媒体监督权,其实也是在助推法治本身。11月9日上午,备受关注的世奢会(北京)国际商业管理有限公司(简称“世奢会”)诉新京报社侵犯其名誉权案,在北京三中院二审宣判。法院终审判决世奢会败诉。涉事法院二审作出的终局判决,宣告着这起聚讼多时的名誉权案件在法律层面得到廓清。此前该案一审时,因匿名消息源问题引发控辩双方激辩,一审判决结果也引发不小争议;如今相关终审判决撤
Judicial justice and just supervision of public opinion, in essence, go through the same course of endeavor, are to defend social justice. Legal protection of the media supervisory authority, in fact, is also to promote the rule of law itself. On the morning of November 9, the closely watched World Luxury Club (Beijing) International Business Management Co., Ltd. (“World Luxury Club”) sued the Beijing News Agency for infringing its reputation right and adjudicated at the Second Court of the Third Intermediate Court of Beijing. Court of Final Appeal will judge World Luxury will lose. The final judgment made by the court of second instance proclaimed that the case of honor for a long time during the court proceedings was cleared at the legal level. Prior to the case at the first instance, due to anonymous source of information sparked controversy between the prosecution and the defense, the verdict of the first instance also led to no small controversy; the relevant final judgment now withdraw