在比较哲学的视阈下,朱熹的“理”和马勒伯朗士的“神”有可以通约的地方,二者都具备“至上性”、“创生性”和“完满性”等特点。当然,二者之间也存在不同之处,马勒伯朗士对朱熹的批判有合理的地方。朱熹关于“理气”思想的含混与基督教纯粹至上的“神”之间有很大不同。不仅如此,朱熹的“理”还带有一定伦理道德的经世色彩,这也是“上帝”观念中所没有的。 In the comparative philosophical perspective, Zhu Xi ’s “Man ” and Maleblanchys “God ” can pass the place, both with “supremacy ”, “originality ”And“ perfect ”“ and so on. Of course, there are differences between the two. There is a reasonable place for the criticism of Zhu Xi by Marleberry. Zhu Xi’s ambiguity about ”Qi “ thought is quite different from that of ”God “ which is purely Christianity. Not only that, Zhu Xi’s ”Li“ also carries a certain ethics of the worldly color, which is also ”God" concept does not exist.