论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨难治性妇产科大出血的临床治疗方法与效果。方法:通过选取我院2013年1月至2014年8月的妇产科大出血患者共100例作为研究对象,将其分为对照组与观察组各50例,观察组采取动脉栓塞术治疗大出血,对照组采取子宫或髂内动脉结扎术。观察两组患者治疗后的效果,比较其出血量等各项指标。结果:观察组与对照组出血量分别为(966.7±226.4)ml和(1451.9±250.6)ml,治疗有效率分别为94.8%和65.2%,观察组出血量少于对照组,治疗效果优于对照组。结论:采取动脉栓塞术治疗大出血疗效快,创口小,具有推广价值。
Objective: To explore the clinical treatment of refractory obstetrics and gynecology bleeding and its effects. Methods: A total of 100 cases of obstetrics and gynecology major bleeding in our hospital from January 2013 to August 2014 were selected as study object, which were divided into control group and observation group of 50 cases each. The observation group was treated with arterial embolization for the treatment of major bleeding, Control group to take the uterus or internal iliac artery ligation. Observe the effect of two groups of patients after treatment, compare the amount of bleeding and other indicators. Results: The bleeding volume in observation group and control group were (966.7 ± 226.4) ml and (1451.9 ± 250.6) ml respectively, the effective rates were 94.8% and 65.2% respectively. The bleeding volume in observation group was less than that in control group, and the treatment effect was better than that in control group group. Conclusion: The curative effect of arterial embolization in the treatment of massive hemorrhage is quick and the wound is small, which has the promotion value.