论文部分内容阅读
严格意义上说,“认识你自己”所反映出的自我知识与心智哲学、知识论中的自我知识并不相同,但它所体现的以反思、怀疑为特征的理性主义与笛卡尔及其后的自我知识传统却表现出显著的一致,甚至可以说,笛卡尔的怀疑论方法根植于苏格拉底所提倡的那种自我检视与自我反省。正是在这个意义上后者可以被视为自我知识的理论起点,而当代自我知识理论的各种论争自然没有脱离苏格拉底之后的理论轨道。当代自我知识争论呈现出不同的形态,对自然主义的态度仅作为标尺之一,可用于不同阵营的哲学家划界,能从一个侧面反映自我知识理论争论的特征。
Strictly speaking, the self-knowledge reflected in “Know Yourself ” is not the same as the self-knowledge in philosophy of mind and epistemology. However, the rationalism characterized by introspection and suspicion is similar to Descartes and Subsequent self-knowledge traditions showed significant agreement. It could even be argued that Descartes’ method of skepticism is rooted in the self-examination and self-examination Socrates advocates. It is in this sense that the latter can be regarded as the starting point of the theory of self-knowledge, and the various arguments of contemporary theory of self-knowledge have naturally not escaped the theoretical post-Socratic path. Contemporary controversy of self-knowledge presents different forms. The attitude towards naturalism is only one of the measures to be taken. It can be used to demarcate the philosophers in different camps and reflect the characteristics of the debates on self-knowledge theory from one aspect.