论文部分内容阅读
利用Willinsky提出的10种开放获取(OA)模式,对CSSCI(2014—2015年)和SSCI(2015年)收录的201种语言学期刊的OA现状进行调查研究。结果表明,国外语言学期刊开放规模更大、程度更高、模式更多;而国内语言学期刊开放渠道较少,使用许可授权严重不足。因此,要加快我国语言学期刊的OA步伐,需要采用多种经济模式、拓宽期刊收入来源、明确使用许可授权、消除语言障碍,从而逐渐过渡到完全OA期刊的模式。
Ten open access (OA) models proposed by Willinsky were used to investigate the current status of OA in 201 linguistic journals, including the CSSCI (2014-2015) and SSCI (2015). The results show that foreign linguistics periodicals are open at a larger scale and at a higher level, with more models. However, the domestic linguistics periodicals have fewer open channels and the licensing authority is seriously inadequate. Therefore, to speed up the pace of OA in China’s linguistics periodicals, we need to adopt a variety of economic models to broaden the sources of journal income, make explicit use of licensing authority, eliminate language barriers and gradually transition to a fully OA journal model.