论文部分内容阅读
从当初学习西方理念到如今本土化研究,并在此次刑诉修正案中专门列入特别程序予以明确规定。可以看出刑事和解已被接受和适用,运用刑事和解是否有悖罪行法定;是否违背程序正义和严格责任;是否真会出现以钱买命。在当下这个司法公信力缺失的困境下,有必要对这些问题予以回应。我认为出现这些问题最核心的问题就是和解介入时机的选择,以及介入后对案件带来的效果进行分析,希望刑事和解的运用能够实现无讼社会的真诚愿望。本文从被害人角度出发,通过分析刑事和解介入不同时机对案件带来的法律效果,来确定何种时机介入对案件效果最佳。
From the original study of Western philosophy to the localization of the present study, and in this criminal appeal amendment special inclusion in special procedures to be clearly defined. It can be seen that criminal reconciliation has been accepted and applied, and whether the application of criminal reconciliation is contrary to the statute of crimes; whether it is against procedural justice and strict liability; In the current situation of the absence of judicial credibility, it is necessary to respond to these questions. In my opinion, the core issue of these problems is the choice of the timing of the intervention and the analysis of the effects brought by the case after the intervention. It is hoped that the application of criminal reconciliation can realize the sincere aspiration of a non-litigious society. From the perspective of the victim, this article analyzes the legal effects brought by criminal reconciliation on different occasions to determine the best time to intervene in the case.