论文部分内容阅读
抽象艺术作为与写实艺术相对立的一种艺术形式,自19世纪以来逐渐成为主要的艺术形式。对于抽象作品中那些不规则的线条、色彩等元素,究竟具有什么样的含义让人无限揣测,又或许,“含义”本身就是一个值得商榷的存在。抽象艺术颠覆了一直以来的古典写实理念,这对于长期受到古典理念侵蚀的艺术家而言,无疑是绘画领域的一次革命。然而,当画面抽象为纯粹的线条和色块时,我们该如何理解这些看似理性的图形是一个值得思考的问题。本文借用克莱夫·贝尔(Clive Bell)“有意味的形式”理论引入,通过分析几位不同类型的抽象艺术家的作品来探索“形式”对于作品的意义。
As an art form that is opposite to realism, abstract art has gradually become the major art form since the 19th century. What are the meanings of the irregular lines, colors and other elements in the abstract works, which make people have endless speculation? Perhaps the “meaning” is an open question in itself. Abstract art has subverted the classical concept of realism, which is undoubtedly a revolution in the field of painting for artists who have long been eroded by classical ideas. However, how we understand these seemingly rational graphics is a question worth considering when the screen is abstracted as pure lines and patches. This article uses the theory of Clive Bell “Meaningful Form ” to explore the meaning of “form ” to the work by analyzing the works of several different types of abstract artists.