论文部分内容阅读
文章以语言历史学派理论为基础,对比了汉文、古代突厥文、古藏文、和阗塞文历史记载,论述了不同语言文献对ik族属和来源的记述,认为ik不是ikil、Kiuk、t■ǐak、Kirkut,而是Km ik;在752年被回纥征服后,其部分迁至漠北、部分迁至焉耆、部分留居原地成为乃蛮的一部。
Based on the theory of linguistic historiography, the article compares the historical records of Chinese, ancient Turks, ancient Tibetan and occlusive essays, discusses the account of different ethnic groups and sources of ik in different linguistic documents, and holds that ik is not ikil, Kiuk, t ■ ǐak, Kirkut, but Km ik; After being conquered in Hui Autonomous Prefecture in 752, it was partially relocated to Mobei and partly to Yanqi, part of which remained a part of Naiman.