近来,再读《鸿门宴》时突生疑惑:是时,项羽为诸侯上将军,尚未自立为王,且怀王也并未封他为王,缘何文中多次称其为“项王”“大王”“君王”?再读《项羽本纪》时又发现,在《鸿门宴》这段选文之前,类似的称呼竟从未出现,而此时的出现,是否太史公刻意而为?实际上,太史公在修《史记》时对历史人物的称谓相当严谨。即便在《高祖本纪》中,司马迁开始也 Recently, when reading the “Banquet of the Banquet,” he suddenly wondered: When Yes, Xiang Yu was a general of the vassal, not independent of the king, and King Huai did not seal him as king, why Wen repeatedly called it “king” “King ” “King ”? Re-read “Xiang Yu Benji” and found that in the “Banquet Banquet” before the electoral text, a similar title has never appeared, and this time the appearance of the history of public opinion is? In fact, Taishi Gong in the “Shi Ji” appellation of historical figures quite rigorous. Even in the “ancestors”, Sima Qian began too