论文部分内容阅读
为深入了解中国科研工作者对开放存取期刊(OAJ)的认知度与认可度,了解其作为读者和作者对信息的需求和生产特点,设计了调查问卷,进行了全国性的问卷调查。调查显示,绝大多数答卷者(94.5%)对OAJ还不了解,但对 OA 理念的认可度高(85.5%),支持率高(76%)。支持在 OAJ 发表论文最重要的两个理由是:OAJ 可提供读者免费获取与使用,OAJ 读者面更广;OAJ 影响大和 OAJ 论文的引用率高。而不支持在 OAJ 发表论文主要是因为:OAJ 不被同行和科研管理部门认可,不了解 OAJ,以及对传统期刊的习惯和偏爱。大多数人支持用项目经费支付 OAJ 论文发表费。论文发表的主流途径仍然是传统期刊和会议论文集。同行评审和论文质量仍是作者评判期刊最重要的指标。近80%的答卷者认同付费发表模式,近70%的答卷者认同单篇文章的出版费低于1500元。调查结果为探索适合中国国情的 OA 出版模式提供事实依据,为制定支持 OA 的国家与机构战略与政策提供参考,同时也有助于期刊出版者及时调整办刊策略,实现 OA,提高期刊质量和服务能力。
In order to gain a deeper understanding of Chinese researchers’ recognition and acceptance of OAJ, and to understand their needs and production features as readers and authors, a questionnaire was designed and a nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted. According to the survey, the vast majority of respondents (94.5%) did not know OAJ yet, but the OA concept was highly recognized (85.5%) and the support rate was high (76%). Two of the most important reasons for supporting the publication of papers in the OAJ are: OAJ provides readers with free access to and use of OAJ readers; OAJ impact is high and OAJ paper citations are high. Not supporting the publication of the paper in the OAJ is mainly because: OAJ is not recognized peer and research management, do not understand the OAJ, as well as traditional habits and preferences of journals. Most people support the use of project funds to pay OAJ papers published fee. Papers published in the mainstream way is still traditional journals and conference essays. Peer review and the quality of the essay are still the most important indicators for authors’ journals. Nearly 80% of the respondents agree that pay-for-publication mode, nearly 70% of respondents agree that a single article publication fee of less than 1,500 yuan. The survey results provide the factual basis for exploring the OA publishing mode suitable for China’s national conditions and provide a reference for the formulation of national and institutional strategies and policies that support OA. It also helps journal publishers to timely adjust their strategies of running OA, improve the quality and service of journals ability.