论文部分内容阅读
《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法典》第15条明确了辩论制原则,但其存在一定的负面效果。该法第86条的证据收集规则使有悖于指控倾向的事实材料、非国家机关性质诉讼参与人取得的鉴定结论及专家结论一律无法归入案卷。这打破了审前诉讼阶段的控辩平等,违背了刑诉法,最终导致了案件客观真相难以查明的后果。
Article 15 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation clarifies the principle of debate, but it has some negative effects. The law of evidence collection in Article 86 of the Law makes the factual material that is contrary to the tendency of accusation and the conclusion of expert conclusion and expert conclusion made by non-state organ nature litigants can not be classified as files. This broke the pre-trial stage of prosecution and defense equality, contrary to the Criminal Procedure Law, eventually leading to the objective truth of the case is difficult to identify the consequences.