论文部分内容阅读
一、中日韩三国学者对铁岭位置的观点1.日韩学界的观点在20世纪10年代至40年代,一些日本学者曾撰文论述铁岭设卫问题,就铁岭位置阐述各自观点,至今在中日韩三国学界产生影响。如池内宏在“高丽辛禑朝的铁岭问题”一文中指出,铁岭卫在黄城即今天的集安。稻叶岩吉对此提出质疑,指出铁岭卫在平安北道的江界,因为江界旧名秃鲁,与铁岭名称相似。和田清在“三万铁岭卫的建设”一文中指出,铁岭卫在咸镜道与江原道分界的地方。末松保和在“丽末鲜初的对明关系”
First, China, Japan and South Korea Scholars view the location of Tieling 1. Japanese and Korean scholars point of view In the 1910s to 1940s, a number of Japanese scholars have written articles on the Tieling set the issue of defense, Tieling position to explain their own views so far in China and Japan Han three scholars have an impact. As the macro in the pool “North Korea North Korea Tieling issue ” article pointed out that Tieling Wei in Huangcheng that Ji’an today. Inaba Yoyogi questioned this and pointed out that Tielingwei is in the Jiangjie community of Ping’an North Road because its name is similar to that of Tieling. He Tianqing pointed out in his article entitled “Construction of the Thousands of Tailing Wei” that Tielingwei is in the place of Xiangyuan Road and Gangwon-do. At the end of Song and Paul in the “beginning of the early Ming Li Ming relations”