论文部分内容阅读
目的:建立社交性应激反应问卷(RSQ-SSV)中文版,并分析其信、效度。方法:按量表翻译程序将RSQ-SSV翻译成中文,整群分层选取409名大学生进行RSQ-SSV中文版的测量。随机抽取90名学生于初评后一个月进行重测,并与美国样本进行比较。结果:RSQ-SSV中文版整个问卷的Cronbachα系数为0.88,各因子α系数在0.73~0.81之间;重测信度为0.70;全量表的条目间平均相关系数为0.11,5因子的条目间平均相关系数在0.19~0.29之间,因子间相关系数在0.12~0.76之间;条目对因子负荷系数在0.38-0.86之间,复相关系数在0.14-0.74之间;验证性因子分析的指标:IFI为0.93,CFI为0.93,TLI为0.92,RMSEA为0.06。中国大学生样本的不随意的逃避反应因子得分高于美国大学生样本[(0.97±0.41)vs.(0.91±0.48),P=0.002],而初级亲近控制应对反应、次级亲近控制应对反应、不随意的亲近反应得分均低于美国大学生样本[(1.75±0.49)vs.(2.12±0.50)、(1.51±0.43)vs.(1.80±0.48)、(1.17±0.44)vs.(1.36±0.56),均P<0.001]。结论:RSQ-SSV中文版具有良好的信、效度,可以试用于我国大学生社交性应激反应的测评。
Objective: To establish a Chinese version of the social stress response questionnaire (RSQ-SSV) and analyze its reliability and validity. Methods: RSQ-SSV was translated into Chinese according to the scale translation program, and 409 college students were selected by stratification for RSQ-SSV Chinese version. A total of 90 students were randomly selected for retesting one month after the first assessment and compared with the U.S. sample. Results: The Cronbach’s coefficient of RSQ-SSV Chinese version was 0.88, the coefficient of each factor was between 0.73 and 0.81, the test-retest reliability was 0.70, the average correlation coefficient between items of full scale was 0.11, The correlation coefficient was between 0.19 and 0.29, the correlation coefficient between the factors was between 0.12 and 0.76, the factor between the items was 0.38-0.86, the complex correlation coefficient was between 0.14 and 0.74, the index of the confirmatory factor analysis was IFI 0.93, CFI 0.93, TLI 0.92, RMSEA 0.06. The involuntary evasion response scores of Chinese college students were higher than those of American college students [(0.97 ± 0.41) vs. (0.91 ± 0.48), P = 0.002], whereas the primary intimacy responses and the secondarily intimacy responses responded, not The random close reaction scores were lower than those of American college students [(1.75 ± 0.49) vs. (2.12 ± 0.50), (1.51 ± 0.43) vs. (1.80 ± 0.48), (1.17 ± 0.44) vs. (1.36 ± 0.56) , Both P <0.001]. Conclusion: The Chinese version of RSQ-SSV has good reliability and validity, which can be used for the evaluation of social stress response among Chinese college students.