Risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients

来源 :Chinese Medical Journal | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:qqqqqqwer
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
Background Advances in treatment have greatly reduced the risk of blindness from this disease, but because diabetes is so common, diabetic retinopathy remains an important problem. The purpose of this study is to investigate the risk factors of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Methods Totally 746 type 2 diabetic patients were selected for biochemical and clinical characteristics test and examined by the retina-camera for diabetic retinopathy and the average age was 55.9 years old. Results A total of 526 patients was classified as non-DR, 159 patients as non-proliferative-DR and 61 patients as proliferative-DR. Duration of diabetes [(66.09±72.51) months vs (143.71±93.27) months vs (174.30±81.91) months, P=0.00], systolic blood pressure [(131.95±47.20) mmHg vs (138.71±21.36) mmHg vs (147.58±24.10) mmHg, P=0.01], urine albumin [(32.79±122.29) mg/L vs (190.96±455.65) mg/L vs (362.00±552.51) mg/L, P=0.00], glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) [(8.68±2.26)% vs (9.42±1.84)% vs (9.42±1.96)%, P=0.04], C-reactive protein (CRP) [(3.19±7.37) mg/L vs (6.36±23.59) mg/L vs (3.02±4.34) mg/L, P=0.03], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [(1.23±0.37) mmol/L vs (1.33±0.35) mmol/L vs (1.24±0.33) mmol/L, P=0.01], uric acid (UA) [(288.51±90.85) mmol/L vs (300.29±101.98) mmol/L vs (337.57±115.09) mmol/L, P=0.00], creatinine (CREA) [(84.22±16.31) μmol/L vs (89.35±27.45) μmol/L vs (103.28±48.64) μmol/L, P=0.00], blood urine nitrogen (BUN) [(5.62±1.62) mmol/L vs (6.55±2.74) mmol/L vs (8.11±3.60) mmol/L, P=0.00] were statistically different among the three groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that diabetic duration and urine albumin were two independent risk factors of DR (the OR values were 1.010 and 1.003 respectively). Conclusions Diabetic duration and urine albumin are two independent risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in elderly type 2 diabetic patients. Background Advances in treatment have greatly reduced the risk of blindness from this disease, but because diabetes is so common, diabetic retinopathy remains an important problem. The purpose of this study is to investigate the risk factors of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Methods Totally 746 type 2 diabetic patients were selected for biochemical and clinical characteristics test and examined by the retina-camera for diabetic retinopathy and the average age was 55.9 years old. Results A total of 526 patients were classified as non-DR, 159 patients as non-proliferative-DR and 61 patients as proliferative-DR. Duration of diabetes [(66.09 ± 72.51) months vs (143.71 ± 93.27) months vs (174.30 ± 81.91) months, P = 0.00] (131.95 ± 47.20) mmHg vs (138.71 ± 21.36) mmHg vs (147.58 ± 24.10) mmHg, P = 0.01], urine albumin [(32.79 ± 122.29) mg / L vs (190.96 ± 455.65) mg / 552.51) mg / L, P = 0.00], glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) [(8.68 ± 2.26)% vs (9.42 ± 1.84)% vs (9.42 ± 1.96)%, P = 0.04], CRP (3.19 ± 7.37) mg / L vs (3.02 ± 4.34) vs (6.36 ± 23.59) mg / (1.23 ± 0.37) mmol / L vs (1.33 ± 0.35) mmol / L vs (1.24 ± 0.33) mmol / L, P = 0.01, P = 0.03] and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) creatinine (CREA) [(84.22 ± 16.31), uric acid (UA) [(288.51 ± 90.85) mmol / L vs (300.29 ± 101.98 mmol / L vs 337.57 ± 115.09 mmol / L, P = 0.00] (BUN) [(5.62 ± 1.62) mmol / L vs (6.55 ± 2.74) mmol / L vs (89.35 ± 27.45) μmol / L vs 103.28 ± 48.64 μmol / L vs (8.11 ± 3.60) mmol / L, P = 0.00] were statistically different among the three groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that diabetic duration and urine albumin were two independent risk factors of DR (the OR values ​​were 1.010 and 1.003 respectively) Conclusions Diabetic duration and urine albumin are two independent risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in elderly type 2 diabetic patients.
其他文献
[关键词]想象力,案例,活动课,课本剧,常态课  [中图分类号] [文献标识码]B [文章编号]0457—6241(2012)03—0029—04 《历史教学》发起关于“历史想象力”的教学研究征文,拨动了笔者长期以来的教学思考之弦。早在2005年5月,笔者曾组织“国共合作抗日记者招待会”的活动课,引起了听课老师对历史教学中“想象和虚拟”的讨论。此后,我校历史组开始了《高中历史“叙事探究”教学策略的