论文部分内容阅读
回应型法主要追求实质正义,而这必然会影响到程序正义,所以,回应型法并未能够解决完整性和开放性两难抉择的问题。究竟怎样可以让法律在保证完整性的前提下具有开放性,是回应型法提出却未明确的问题。中国法学总体上符合时代和国情的需要,然而在建构过程中,也应借鉴一下回应型法的长处,这样使我国的社会主义法治尽可能地能回应社会的需要,逐步实现程序正义与实质正义之统一。
Response law mainly pursues substantive justice, which will inevitably affect the procedural justice. Therefore, the response law does not solve the dilemma of integrity and openness. How exactly the law can be open under the precondition of ensuring completeness is a question that the response-oriented law has proposed but is not yet clear. Chinese jurisprudence generally meets the needs of the times and national conditions. However, in the course of its construction, we should learn from the strengths of the response law so that our socialist law and order can respond to the needs of society as much as possible and gradually realize procedural justice and substantive justice The unity.