《孙膑兵法》“下编”一直备受争议,疑其非属《孙膑兵法》。对此,我们认为,应将“下编”十五篇作逐一考察以分别定性。其中,就《奇正》篇来说,其涉及“名”之命题,根据我们的考察,这应是在当时稷下文化背景下,诸子融合在兵家的表现。而篇中以“奇正”为代表的兵家思想,论述精湛,是对孙武“奇正”思想的拓展性解说,在孙氏之道的传承中发挥了重要作用。总之,从各方面考证来看,此篇的作者应是孙膑或其弟子,属于齐国稷下学宫时期的作品。 The law of Sun Bin “” under “” has been controversial, doubt it is “Sun Bin war.” In this regard, we think that we should examine the fifteen articles in the “Editor” one by one to separate them qualitatively. Among them, “Qi Zheng” is concerned with the proposition of “name ”. According to our investigation, this should be the manifestation of the incorporation of the sons into the military under the Jixia culture. The commentary on military strategists represented by “Qi Zheng ” in his essay, elaborates exquisitely, is an extended explanation of Sun Wu ’s idea of ​​“Qi Zheng ” and played an important role in the inheritance of Sun’ s theory. In short, from all aspects of research, the author of this article should be Sun Yat-sen or his disciples, belonging to Qi Guanyi school age works.