论文部分内容阅读
在执法实践中,经常与住宅权发生关系的公权力无疑是警察权。要合理构建警察权与住宅权之间的关系必须充分考虑警察进入公民住宅的条件、时间、程序、方式、相对人的意愿等要素,甚至对于何谓“住宅”也应做审慎的判断。完善的制度为警察执法提供合理的指引,但深入分析我国关于警察权与住宅权关系的法律制度,会发现其中尚存在诸多不完善之处。这主要表现在:关于“住宅”的法律用语混乱,有“住所”、“住处”以及“场所”等不同的表述;警察进入住宅的法律定位不科学,出现错位的现象;警察进入公民住宅的制度设计存在重大缺失等。针对上述问题,有必要在制度上进行调整与完善,最终推进警察权与住宅权之间合理关系的形成。
In law enforcement practice, the public power often associated with the right to housing is undoubtedly the police power. In order to rationally construct the relationship between police power and housing rights, the conditions, time, procedures and methods of the policemen entering the residences of citizens and the wishes of the counterparts must be fully considered. Even judgments about what is meant by “residences” should be made. A sound system provides a reasonable guideline for police enforcement. However, in-depth analysis of China’s legal system on the relationship between police power and housing rights, we find that there are still many imperfections in it. This is mainly manifested in the following: different legal expressions about “dwelling house ” have different expressions such as “dwelling place ”, “dwelling place ” and “place ”; the legal orientation of police entering dwelling houses is unscientific, The phenomenon of the police entering the civil housing system there is a significant lack of such. In response to the above problems, it is necessary to make adjustments and improvements in the system and ultimately push forward the formation of a reasonable relationship between police power and housing rights.