论文部分内容阅读
审判委员会制度是我国司法制度的重要组成部分,在疑难、复杂、重大案件讨论中发挥着重要功能。但是,随着司法领域新问题、新情况不断出现,审委会的弊端也逐渐显现出来,就我国目前的国情和司法环境而言,不宜简单地废除审委会制度,而是应当结合司法改革实践,对其组织结构、性质、职能平衡等方面内容进行改革。将审判委员会由现在的最高审判组织逐步转变为案件咨询组织,通过改革组织人员结构,建立专业审判委员会和审委会全体会议的双重结构,开展不同的职能;通过限制案件讨论范围,强化其总结审判经验和审判管理方面的职能,为基层法院涉及全局性的工作的开展提供帮助和指导。
The judicial committee system is an important part of our judicial system and plays an important role in the discussion of difficult, complex and important cases. However, with the new problems and new situations in the judicial field constantly emerging, the drawbacks of the CRIC gradually emerge. In view of the current national conditions and judicial environment in our country, we should not simply abolish the system of judicial review committees but should combine judicial reforms Practice, and reform its contents such as its organizational structure, nature and functional balance. The Judicial Committee will be gradually transformed from the current supreme judicial organization into a case consultation organization, which will carry out different functions through reforming the organizational structure of personnel, establishing the dual structure of professional trial committees and plenary sessions of the Committee, and strengthening its conclusion by limiting the scope of discussion of cases Trial experience and trial management functions, to provide assistance and guidance for the grass-roots court involving the overall work carried out.