论文部分内容阅读
禁止反言(estoppel)是依托衡平法上的公平正义理念发展起来的法律原则,指不允许一方当事人使用矛盾的行为或语言主张对另一方当事人的权利。禁止反言原则发轫于诉讼程序中的证据法规则,发展于实体规则,其后为以英美法系国家为代表的大部分国家接受。当今在国际商事仲裁程序和外国仲裁裁决承认及执行程序中也得到广泛适用。然而目前国内尚无全面、系统研究禁止反言制度的著作。本文简要梳理了诉讼领域禁止反言的发端,重点分析了国际商事仲裁程序和仲裁裁决承认与执行过程中禁止反言原则的适用,并针对我国已有的相关立法规定和司法实践构建了我国仲裁领域采纳禁止反言原则的路径。
Estoppel is a legal principle relied on the principle of fairness and justice based on the principle of equitable and equitable justice. It refers to not allowing one of the parties to use contradictory acts or language to claim the other party’s rights. Prohibition of the principle of the principle of evasion issued in the proceedings of the law of evidence law, developed in substantive rules, followed by the majority of countries represented by common law countries accepted. It is also widely used today in the process of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitral proceedings and foreign arbitral awards. However, at present, there is no comprehensive and systematic study of the system that prohibits anti-allegiance. This article briefly reviews the origins of anti-estoppel in the field of litigation, emphasizes the application of the principle of estoppel in the process of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration procedures and arbitral awards, and constructs our country’s arbitration in light of the existing relevant legislative provisions and judicial practices in our country The area adopts the path of the estoppel principle.