班固对司马迁史学思想的批评,是中国史学史上的一个重大问题,历来学者对此议论不一.作者通过具体分析,指出:班固的评语抓住了当时史学思想上的一个重要问题,他的议论充分表明了班、马二人在追求“大一统”和“求安治富”的前提下,对某些大问题的意见分歧,丰富了传统的史学思想,具有重要的意义.如今反思之,一方面可以分析和考察班、马史学思想的异同长短,另一方面也有助于以史为鉴,朔往思来. Ban Gu’s criticism of Sima Qian’s historiographical thought is a major issue in the history of Chinese historiography, which has been historically divided among scholars.According to the concrete analysis, the author points out that Ban Gu’s commentary grasps an important issue of historical thought and his argument This fully demonstrates that in the premise of pursuing “unification of one country” and “seeking prosperity and prosperity of the rich,” Ma and Du both have different opinions on some major issues and enriched the traditional historical thoughts, which is of great significance. In terms of the similarities and differences between the class and the historiography of horses, we can also analyze and study the similarities and differences between the two schools and on the other hand, it also helps to draw lessons from history and to think of it.