以往中学课本中对《荷塘月色》作了较大的删节,特别是对江南采莲一段大量删除,影响了文章的整体感,使师生们学习时很难准确地把握其结构层次。两省一市实验教材则较完整地选用了该文,因而也就较完整准确地表现出了作者的构思及写作意图。笔者以为,作者是以其思绪和感情的?.. In the old school textbooks, the “Lotus Pond Moonlight” was greatly abridged, and the removal of a large number of Cainan lotus leaves affected the overall sense of the article, making it difficult for teachers and students to accurately grasp the structure level. Two provinces and one city experiment textbooks have chosen the article more completely, and thus the author’s conception and writing intention have been expressed more completely and accurately. I believe that the author is based on his thoughts and feelings?