论文部分内容阅读
近几年来,许多刊物都面临着审稿人队伍老龄化问题。老专家们有经验丰富的优势,但有些审稿人难以适应审稿时间以及新兴和边缘学科论文的审稿质量要求。因此,有必要发现和扶持一批年龄在35～50岁的年富力强的审稿人。笔者根据从事学报编辑工作的实践,谈谈如何实现审稿人队伍的年轻化。一是请编委推荐。学报的编委一般均为其学科具有代表性的学术带头人,对其所研究领域的发展动态以及学术水平突出的中、青年学者的情况掌握较多,加之对学报审稿人应具备的条件比较了解,因此经他们推荐的审稿人一般都能够热心于学报,胜
In recent years, many publications are facing the issue of the aging reviewer team. Older experts have the advantage of being experienced, but some reviewers find it hard to adapt to the manuscript review time and the reviewers’ quality requirements for emerging and marginal dissertations. Therefore, it is necessary to find and support a group of veteran reviewers aged 35 to 50 years old. According to the author in the practice of journal editing work, talk about how to achieve retiring ranks younger. First, please editorial board recommended. Journal editors are generally academic leaders in their disciplines, and have more mastery of the development of their fields of study and of young and middle-aged scholars with outstanding academic standards. In addition, the editors should have the necessary conditions More understanding, so the reviewers recommended by them generally can be enthusiastic about the journal, victory