论文部分内容阅读
质量是地方志书的生命,也是修志工作永恒的话题。第二轮志书总体质量比首轮修志有了很大的提高,但也有不少志书和志稿的质量令人担忧,其中的共性问题是:在资料上缺乏主线引领,没有反映出改革开放以来的变化和发展,缺乏时代特征和时代气息;在记述事物时缺乏深度,平铺直叙的多,甚至流水账式的写法仍然大行其道。这些问题的存在,极大地影响了第二轮志书的质量和为社会服务功能的发挥,应引起方志同仁重视。
Quality is the life of local history books, and it is also the eternal topic of working for history books. The overall quality of the second round of volunteers is much higher than that of the first round of checks, but there are also many complaints about the quality of volunteers and their contributions. The common problems are: the lack of a leading lead in the information, the failure to reflect the reform and opening up The changes and developments since the recent years lacked the characteristics of the times and the flavor of the times. The lack of depth in narratives, the straightforward narration, and even the running account still prevailed. The existence of these problems has greatly affected the quality of the second round of volunteers and the function of serving the community, and should arouse their attention.